🔗 Share this article

Mainstream parties in power are more and more allowing the radical right to set the political agenda, as per a new research conducted in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Researchers found that this phenomenon has unwittingly benefited far-right groups by validating their viewpoints and disseminating them more widely.

Study Drawing from Over 20 Years of News Reporting

The results, released in the European Journal of Political Research, utilized an automated text analysis of more than 520,000 news pieces from a half-dozen national newspapers.

Berlin-based researchers observed that as the far right moved from marginal topics in the 1990s era to central subjects like assimilation and immigration, mainstream political groups increasingly adapted their messaging in response.

This adaptation boosted the dissemination of these ideas and indicated to voters that such stances were acceptable.

Implications for Democracy

"Political discourse by established political groups is crucial in the electoral success of the far right," stated a expert in political behavior participating in the research.

"This factor has been overlooked," she added.

The effect was evident even when conventional parties were criticising the radical faction. "You're still giving them attention," the researcher remarked. "The main point is that because we live in such a battle for attention, this attention is crucial."

Normalisation Phenomenon Throughout the Continent

While the research was centered around the German context, this normalisation effect is probable to affect countries across Europe.

"You see this a lot in German and British news outlets," said another co-author. "The far right makes a statement and everyone starts talking about it for several days."

"Even if you're opposing it, you're echoing it," he stated.

Toughening of Political Rhetoric

At times, political figures have also toughened their language to match that of the radical right.

In a recently published interview, a former German chancellor called for widespread deportations and pushed for them to happen "more often and faster."

Comparable examples can be found throughout Europe, as elected officials from nations including the United Kingdom to the French Republic adopt the rhetoric of the radical right, particularly on migration.

This has formed an echo chamber that was inconceivable a decade ago.

Central Issue: Who Dictates the Agenda?

"{If you're a centrist political group and you are discussing societal topics – migration, integration – in a way that is determined by the rhythm of the radical right, that's the essence of agenda setting," explained a study author.

Other political parties have gone one step further, attempting to emulate the hardline platform of the radical right, despite research indicates that doing so leads the electorate to vote for the far right.

Gradual Influence and Voter Awareness

The extent of data gathered revealed that the impact of radical groups had been gradual and had increased with the passage of time.

"Public perception doesn't change from one day to another," stated a researcher. "However, when you hear this negative framing around immigration frequently, and it is being disseminated not only by far-right parties but also, for example, by mainstream parties, then of course this narrative travels further."

Requirement for Established Parties to Develop Their Distinct Narratives

The research emphasized the need for established political parties to carve out their own discourses, especially on subjects such as immigration and integration, rather than continuously trailing after the radical right.

"It resembles a choreography," explained one researcher. "If the conductor is far-right and you're responding to them, you lose the ability to choose which music should be heard."